Lantheus Presents New Data on the Effectiveness of Novel PET Cardiac Imaging Agent Flurpiridaz F 18 in Obese Patients with Suspected Heart Disease at ACC Scientific Session
Flurpiridaz F 18 Demonstrates Improved Coronary Artery Disease Detection and Reduced Radiation Exposure in Difficult to Image, High BMI Patients Compared to SPECT MPI
This Smart News Release features multimedia. View the full release here: http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20160404005761/en/

An example of a 59-year-old male subject with a BMI of 30 in Lantheus’ first Phase 3 clinical trial of flurpiridaz F 18 PET imaging, studied using exercise stress. Quantitative angiography showed a stenosis of 72% in the left circumflex coronary artery and smaller stenoses (<50%) in the left anterior descending and the right coronary arteries. Three expert readers blinded to all clinical information and without knowledge that the two studies were from the same subject assessed the SPECT study as “normal” but correctly assessed the flurpiridaz F 18 PET study as abnormal. (Graphic: Business Wire)
The moderated poster entitled, “Improved Assessment of CAD in Obese
Subjects with Flurpiridaz F 18 PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: A
Subset Analysis of the Flurpiridaz F 18 301 Phase 3 Study,” will be
presented by
“Nearly 70% of American adults are either overweight or obese, putting this patient population at a greater risk of heart disease, stroke, high blood pressure, diabetes, and other potential health problems,” said Dr. Bateman, the lead author of the poster. “Obese patients present a significant imaging challenge, and improved imaging modalities are needed to accurately and reliably assess this patient population. The results of this study provide evidence of the particular utility and future potential of flurpiridaz F 18 PET imaging for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in people with a BMI of 30 or higher.”
Based on a blinded read of PET and SPECT data, flurpiridaz F 18 PET imaging demonstrated a statistically greater sensitivity (71.1%) versus SPECT (51.7%) (p<0.001) and similar specificity (79.8%) versus SPECT (77.5%) (p=0.002 for non-inferiority testing). The diagnostic superiority of flurpiridaz F 18 PET imaging versus SPECT was demonstrated by ROC analysis (p<0.001).
A significantly higher percentage of images were rated as either excellent or good quality with flurpiridaz F 18 PET imaging, compared to SPECT for stress images (p<0.001) and rest images (p<0.001). Diagnostic certainty of interpretation (the percentage of cases with definitely abnormal or definitely normal interpretation) was significantly higher for flurpiridaz F 18 PET imaging compared to SPECT (p<0.001). No drug-related serious adverse events were observed. Importantly, radiation exposure associated with flurpiridaz F 18 PET imaging was reduced to less than 50% of that associated with standard SPECT.
The data are from a multicenter, international (
"The Phase 3 data sub-analysis presented at ACC show the advantages of
flurpiridaz F 18 PET imaging for coronary artery disease detection in
obese patients,” said
About the Flurpiridaz F 18 First Phase 3 Study
The first flurpiridaz F 18 Phase 3 study was designed to assess the
diagnostic efficacy of flurpiridaz F 18 PET imaging versus SPECT with
Tc99m-labeled agents for CAD detection in the same patients. Patients
with known or suspected CAD who were either scheduled for or had
completed invasive coronary angiography (without intervention) were
included in the study. Each patient was studied using both one-day
rest/stress flurpiridaz F 18 PET imaging and Tc99m-labeled SPECT imaging
(one-day rest/stress or two-day protocol). Images were interpreted by
three expert readers blinded to all clinical information. Quantitative
coronary angiography (QCA) was used as the truth standard, with patients
considered CAD positive with a stenosis ≥ 50% in at least one major
vessel by QCA. Flurpiridaz F 18 PET imaging substantially outperformed
SPECT, in sensitivity, one of the study’s primary endpoints, but did not
meet the study’s other primary endpoint, non-inferiority for
specificity, implying a substantial and unexpected under-diagnosis of
CAD with SPECT in the trial. Unlike flurpiridaz F 18 PET imaging, SPECT
results were skewed with low sensitivity and high specificity when
compared to the truth standard. In secondary endpoints, flurpiridaz F 18
PET imaging outperformed SPECT in image quality and diagnostic certainty
with less than half of the radiation exposure for patients. Subsequent
to the initial read of the data, LMI performed a re-read which confirmed
the initial results as well as showed improved performance of
flurpiridaz F 18 PET imaging as compared to SPECT in women and subjects
with high body mass index. Based on the results of the first Phase 3
study, the Company redesigned the protocol for its second Phase 3 study,
including different primary endpoints – namely, the performance of
flurpiridaz F 18 on its own merit versus coronary angiography as the
truth standard – and the Company has received a Special Protocol
Assessment from the
About Flurpiridaz F 18 and Coronary Artery Disease
Flurpiridaz F 18, a fluorine 18-labeled agent that binds to
mitochondrial complex 1 (MC-1)1, was designed to be a novel
PET imaging agent that may better evaluate patients with known or
suspected CAD, which is the most common form of heart disease2,
affecting an estimated 15.4 million Americans 20 years of age or older3.
CAD is the leading cause of death in
About PET and MPI
PET imaging or a PET scan is a type of nuclear medicine imaging procedure4 that provides information about the function and metabolism of the body’s organs, unlike computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which primarily show anatomy and structure5. MPI is a non-invasive test that utilizes a small amount of radioactive material (radiopharmaceutical) injected into the body to depict the distribution of blood flow to the heart. MPI is used to identify areas of reduced blood flow to the heart muscle. The test is typically conducted under both rest and stress conditions, after which physicians examine and compare the two scans and predict whether the patient has significant coronary artery disease6. Although SPECT is most commonly used for MPI7, PET imaging has gained considerable support and use in the field of cardiovascular imaging, as it offers many advantages to SPECT, including higher spatial and contrast resolution, resulting in higher image quality and improved diagnostic accuracy, accurate attenuation correction and risk stratification8.
About
Safe Harbor for Forward-Looking and Cautionary Statements
This press release contains forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such
forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that
may be described from time to time in our filings with the
1 Yalamanchili, P, Wexler, E, Hayes, M, Yu, M, MD, Bozek J,
Radeke, H, Azure, M, Purohit, A, Casebier, DS, and
2
3 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics. 2014 Update: A Report
From the
4 Radiology Info. What is Positron Emission Tomography –
Computed Tomography (PET/CT) Scanning. http://www.radiologyinfo.org/en/info.cfm?pg=PET.
Accessed
5
6
7 Salerno, M and Beller, GA, Noninvasive Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009; 2:412-424.
8 Heller, G, Calnon, D and Dorbala, S. Recent Advances in Cardiac PET and PET/CT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2009; 16:962-9.
View source version on businesswire.com: http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20160404005761/en/
Source:
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
Meara Murphy, 978-671-8508