Lantheus Presents Results from the Primary Analysis of Phase 3 Pivotal SPLASH Trial in PSMA-Positive Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer During ESMO Congress 2024
Study met its primary endpoint, demonstrating significant improvement in radiographic progression-free survival
Overall Response Rate was 38.1% vs. 12.0% for the ARPI switch arm, including 9.3% Complete Responses
Patients demonstrated statistically significant improvement in time to reduction of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as measured by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—Prostate (FACT-P)
Interim Overall Survival Crossover Adjusted
Overall Survival data continue to mature, an update is expected once data are available for 75% of protocol-specified target OS events
“We are encouraged by the initial results from the SPLASH trial, with 177Lu-PNT2002 demonstrating improvement compared to ARPI change in radiographic progression-free survival, positive interim crossover-adjusted overall survival hazard ratios, as well as improved quality of life,” said
Efficacy Endpoint | 177Lu-PNT2002 vs. ARPI | ||
Radiographic Progression-Free Survival (rPFS) | HR 0.71 (CI: 0.55, 0.92; p=0.0088) | ||
Median rPFS | 9.5 vs. 6.0 months | ||
OS HR (46% of protocol-specified target OS events reached) | 1.11 (0.73, 1.69; p=0.6154) | ||
OS HR crossover adjusted: prespecified RPSFTM* | 1.14 (0.54, 2.53) | ||
Two-Stage Method: no recensoring** | 0.68 (0.44, 1.04) | ||
Two-Stage Method: recensoring** |
0.85 (0.53, 1.36) | ||
Inverse Probability Censoring Weighting (IPCW)** |
0.72 (0.48, 1.12) | ||
Objective Response Rate (ORR) by BICR*** | 38.1% vs. 12.0% (p=0.0021) | ||
Median Duration of Response (DOR) | 9.4 vs. 7.3 months | ||
PSA50 Response**** | 35.7% vs. 14.6% | ||
Biochemical Progression Free Survival (bPFS) | 7.0 vs. 3.9 months (HR 0.58; CI: 0.44, 0.76; p<0.0001) | ||
Median time to deterioration by FACT-P | 8.1 vs. 5.3 months (HR 0.59; CI: 0.44, 0.80; p=0.0005) | ||
Time to Opioid Use for Cancer-Related Pain | HR 0.64 (CI: 0.42, 0.98; p=0.0366) |
*Overlapping OS curves suggest potential violation of statistical assumptions in RPSFTM method; **exploratory analyses; ***confirmed and unconfirmed ORR; ****evaluable subjects with baseline PSA value
The pivotal SPLASH trial met its primary endpoint, demonstrating a median radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) per blinded independent central review of 9.5 months for patients treated with 177Lu-PNT2002, compared to 6.0 months for patients treated with ARPI in the control arm, a statistically significant 29% reduction in the risk of radiographic progression or death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.71; p=0.0088). In the SPLASH study, 177Lu-PNT2002 patients demonstrated significantly improved ORR, PSA50 reduction, time to reduction of HRQoL, and time to opioid use for cancer-related pain in PSMA-positive mCRPC patients who had progressed on an ARPI. At the time of the analysis, 84.6% of patients who experienced progressive disease in the control arm subsequently crossed over to receive 177Lu-PNT2002. The overall survival (OS) results at 46% of protocol-specified target OS events reached had a HR of 1.11, with additional crossover adjusted HRs for rank preserving structural failure time model (RPSFTM): (1.14); Two-Stage: no recensoring (0.68); Two-Stage recensoring (0.85); and Inverse Probability Censoring Weighting (0.72).
177Lu-PNT2002 also demonstrated a favorable safety profile compared to patients treated with ARPI in the control arm. Only 3.0% of patients treated with 177Lu-PNT2002 halted or reduced therapy as a result of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), compared to 11.5% of patients treated with ARPI, and 17.1% of 177Lu-PNT2002 patients experienced serious TEAEs compared to 23.1% of ARPI patients.
Adverse Events | 177Lu-PNT2002 | ARPI |
Treatment-related AEs grade ≥ 3 | 9.7% (26/269) | 11.5% (15/130) |
Treatment-related serious AEs | 2.2% (6/269) | 3.8% (5/130) |
Treatment-related AEs leading to death | 0.0% (0/269) | 0.0% (0/130) |
“177Lu-PNT2002 is outperforming the control arm and showing an improved quality of life for patients based on this interim analysis,” said
About the SPLASH Trial
The Phase 3 SPLASH trial is a multicenter, randomized, open-label assessment of 177Lu-PNT2002 administered at 6.8 GBq for up to 4 cycles in patients with PSMA-expressing mCRPC who have progressed on ARPI therapy and refuse, or are not eligible for, chemotherapy. The randomization phase of the study randomized 412 patients across
At the time of the primary analysis, 84.6% of patients who experienced progressive disease in the control arm subsequently crossed over to receive 177Lu-PNT2002. SPLASH was conducted across
About 177Lu-PNT2002
177Lu-PNT2002 is a PSMA-targeted, lutetium 177-based radioligand therapy candidate that combines a PSMA-targeted ligand, PSMA-I&T, with the beta-emitting radioisotope no-carrier-added lutetium-177. Lantheus in-licensed exclusive worldwide commercialization rights (excluding certain Asian territories) to 177Lu-PNT2002 from POINT Biopharma (a Lilly company) in December of 2022. In April of 2023, the FDA granted Fast Track designation for 177Lu-PNT2002 for the treatment of mCRPC. Fast Track is a process designed to facilitate the development and expedite the review of drugs to treat serious conditions and address unmet medical needs.
About Prostate Cancer
Prostate cancer is the second most common form of cancer affecting men in
About
Safe Harbor for Forward-Looking and Cautionary Statements
This press release contains “forward-looking statements” that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements relating to the potential of PNT2002 and statements regarding Lantheus’ expectations, hopes, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding the future. In addition, any statements that refer to projections, forecasts or other characterizations of future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements may be identified by their use of terms such as "expected,” “look,” “planned,” “potential,” “will,” and other similar terms. Such forward-looking statements are based upon current plans, estimates and expectations that are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to materially differ from those described in the forward-looking statements. Risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to materially differ from those described in the forward-looking statements include (i) the outcome of the SPLASH trial after full data is available; (ii) a delay in obtaining, or failure to obtain, a positive regulatory outcome from the FDA and regulatory authorities for PNT2002; (iii) the additional costs and risks associated with Lantheus’ ability to successfully launch PNT2002 as a commercial product; (iv) the market and patient receptivity to PNT2002 as a radiopharmaceutical therapy; (v) the existence, availability and profile of competing products and therapies; (vi) Lantheus’ ability to obtain and maintain adequate coding, coverage and payment for PNT2002; (vii) the intellectual property protection of PNT2002; (viii) POINT Biopharma’s ability to successfully develop and scale the manufacturing capabilities to support the launch of PNT2002; and (ix) the risks and uncertainties discussed in Lantheus’ filings with the
Contacts:
Vice President, Investor Relations
978-671-8842
ir@lantheus.com
Senior Director,
646-975-2533
media@lantheus.com
1
Source: Lantheus Holdings, Inc.